Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaborosa integrifolia | Lam. | 85 | documented |
| Jaborosa runcinata | Lam. | 79 | documented |
| Jaborosa reflexa | Phil. | 60 | documented |
| Jaborosa rotacea | (Lillo) Hunz. & Barboza | 27 | documented |
| Jaborosa caulescens | Gillies & Hook. | 24 | documented |
| Jaborosa magellanica | (Griseb.) Dusén | 15 | documented |
| Jaborosa leucotricha | (Speg.) Hunz. | 12 | documented |
| Jaborosa bergii | Hieron. | 9 | documented |
| Jaborosa kurtzii | Hunz. & Barboza | 7 | documented |
| Jaborosa laciniata | (Miers) Hunz. & Barboza | 7 | documented |
| Jaborosa odonelliana | Hunz. | 6 | documented |
| Jaborosa pinnata | Phil. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa ameghinoi | (Speg.) Macloskie & Dusén | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa araucana | Phil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa cabrerae | Barboza | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa chubutensis | Barboza & Hunz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa lanigera | (Phil.) Hunz. & Barboza | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa oxipetala | Speg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa parviflora | (Phil.) Hunz. & Barboza | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa riojana | Hunz. & Barboza | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa sativa | (Miers) Hunz. & Barboza | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa squarrosa | (Miers) Hunz. & Barboza | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Jaborosa volkmannii | (Phil.) Reiche | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.