Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iodes africana | Welw. ex Oliv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes cirrhosa | Turcz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes globulifera | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes kamerunensis | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes klaineana | Pierre | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes liberica | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes madagascariensis | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes nectarifera | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes ovalis | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes perrieri | Sleumer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes philippinensis | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes pierlotii | Boutique | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes reticulata | King | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes scandens | (Becc.) Utteridge & Byng | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes seguinii | (H.Lév.) Rehder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes seretii | (De Wild.) Boutique | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes usambarensis | Sleumer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes velutina | King | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes vitiginea | (Hance) Hemsl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes vitiginea | (Hance) Hance | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes yangambiensis | Louis ex Boutique | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Iodes yatesii | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.