Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incarvillea diffusa | Royle | 4 | documented |
| Incarvillea younghusbandii | Sprague | 4 | documented |
| Incarvillea sinensis | Lam. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea altissima | Forrest | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea beresowskii | Batalin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea compacta | Maxim. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea delavayi | Bureau & Franch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea dissectifolia | Q.S.Zhao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea emodi | (Royle ex Lindl.) Chatterjee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea forrestii | H.R.Fletcher | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea himalayensis | Grey-Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea lutea | Bureau & Franch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea mairei | (H.Lév.) Grierson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea olgae | Regel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea potaninii | Batalin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea semiretschenskia | (B.Fedtsch.) Grierson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea uniflora | H.P.Deng & Chang Y.Xia | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Incarvillea zhongdianensis | Grey-Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.