Imbribryum

Accepted species 20 Documented here 5 Family Bryaceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Imbribryum miniatum (Lesq.) J.R.Spence 67 documented
Imbribryum alpinum (Huds. ex With.) N.Pedersen 20 documented
Imbribryum torenii J.R.Spence & Shevock 14 documented
Imbribryum subapiculatum (Hampe) D.Bell & Holyoak 8 documented
Imbribryum laevigatum (Hook.f. & Wilson) J.R.Spence & H.P.Ramsay 6 documented
Imbribryum australe (Hampe) J.R.Spence & H.P.Ramsay 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum baldwinii (Broth.) J.R.Spence 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum bessonii (Renauld & Cardot) Ochyra & Bedn.-Ochyra 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum cheelii (Broth.) J.R.Spence & H.P.Ramsay 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum clavatum (Schimp.) J.R.Spence & H.P.Ramsay 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum crassum (Hook.f. & Wilson) J.R.Spence & H.P.Ramsay 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum incacorralis (Herzog) Ochyra & Bedn.-Ochyra 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum megalostegium (Sull.) J.R.Spence 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum microchaeton (Hampe) J.R.Spence 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum mildeanum (Jur.) J.R.Spence 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum muehlenbeckii (Bruch & Schimp.) N.Pedersen 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum orthotheciellae (Müll.Hal.) Ochyra & Bedn.-Ochyra 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum paradoxum (Schwägr.) Ochyra & Bedn.-Ochyra 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum tenuisetum (Limpr.) D.Bell & Holyoak 0 below the evidence gate
Imbribryum tristaniense (Dixon) Ochyra & Bedn.-Ochyra 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.