Hyptidendron

Accepted species 20 Documented here 0 Family Lamiaceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Hyptidendron albidum Harley & Antar 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron amethystoides (Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron arboreum (Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron arbusculum (Epling) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron asperrimum (Spreng.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron canum (Pohl ex Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron caudatum (Epling & Játiva) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron claussenii (Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron conspersum (Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron dictiocalyx (Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron eximium (Epling) Harley & J.F.B.Pastore 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron glutinosum (Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron leucophyllum (Pohl ex Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron pulcherrimum Antar & Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron rhabdocalyx (Mart. ex Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron rondonicum (Harley) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron roseum Antar, Harley & J.F.B.Pastore 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron unilaterale (Epling) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron vauthieri (Briq.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate
Hyptidendron vepretorum (Mart. ex Benth.) Harley 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.