Hydnocarpus

Accepted species 55 Documented here 2 Family Achariaceae

Accepted species 55 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Hydnocarpus pentandrus (Buch.-Ham.) Oken 29 documented
Hydnocarpus alpinus Wight 20 documented
Hydnocarpus alcalae C.DC. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus annamensis Lescot & Sleumer ex Harwood & B.L.Webber 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus annamica H.L.Li 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus anomalus (Merr.) Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus beccarianus Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus borneensis Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus calophyllus (Ridl.) Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus calvipetalus Craib 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus castanea Hook.f. & Thomson 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus castaneus Hook.f. & Thomson 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus cauliflora Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus corymbosa Seem. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus corymbosus (Choisy ex DC.) Seem. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus crassifolius Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus cucurbitina King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus cucurbitinus King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus curtisii King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus dawnensis C.E.Parkinson & C.E.C.Fisch. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus elmeri Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus filipes Symington & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus glaucescens Blume 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus gracilis (Slooten) Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus hainanensis (Merr.) Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus heteroclitus Spreng. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus heterophyllus Blume 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus humei Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus ilicifolia King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus ilicifolius King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus kunstleri (King) Warb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus kurzii (King) Warb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus lanceolatus Spreng. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus longipedunculatus Robi, Sasidh. & Jose 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus macrocarpa (Bedd.) Warb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus macrocarpus (Bedd.) Warb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus merrillianus Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus nana King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus nanus King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus octandra Thwaites 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus octandrus Thwaites 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus pendulus Manilal, T.Sabu & Sivar. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus pinguis Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus polypetalus (Slooten) Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus saigonensis Pierre ex Gagnep. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus scortechinii King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus subfalcata Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus sumatranus (Miq.) Koord. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus tenuipetalus Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus venenata Gaertn. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus venenatus Gaertn. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus verrucosus C.E.Parkinson & C.E.C.Fisch. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus woodii Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus wrayi King 0 below the evidence gate
Hydnocarpus yatesii Merr. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.