Hubertia

Accepted species 22 Documented here 1 Family Asteraceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Hubertia tomentosa Bory 3 documented
Hubertia adenodonta (DC.) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia ambavilla Bory 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia andringitrensis (Humbert) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia bathiaei (Humbert) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia beguei (Humbert) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia faujasioides (Baker) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia foliatilis (S.Moore) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia heimii (Humbert) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia humblotii (Klatt) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia hypargyrea (DC.) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia ivohibeensis (Humbert) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia lapsanifolia (Baker) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia leucanthothamnus (Humbert) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia multifoliosa (Klatt) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia myricifolia (Bojer ex DC.) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia myrtifolia (Klatt) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia neoheimii (Humbert) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia olivacea (Klatt) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia riparia (DC.) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia rosellata (Bojer ex DC.) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate
Hubertia tsimihety (Humbert) C.Jeffrey 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.