Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homalanthus populifolius | Graham | 473 | documented |
| Homalanthus novoguineensis | K.Schum. | 13 | documented |
| Homalanthus fastuosus | (Linden) Fern.-Vill. | 8 | documented |
| Homalanthus ebracteatua | Guillaumin | 5 | documented |
| Homalanthus polyandrus | (Hook.f. ex Müll.Arg.) Cheeseman | 4 | documented |
| Homalanthus nutans | Guill. | 3 | documented |
| Homalanthus acuminatus | (Müll.Arg.) Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus arfakiensis | Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus caloneurus | Airy Shaw | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus giganteus | Zoll. & Moritzi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus grandifolius | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus longipes | Pax & K.Hoffm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus longistylus | K.Schum. & Lauterb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus macradenius | Pax & K.Hoffm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus nervosus | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus polyadenius | Pax & K.Hoffm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus populneus | Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus remotus | Esser | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus repandus | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus schlechteri | Pax & K.Hoffm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus stillingifolius | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus stokesii | F.Br. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Homalanthus trivalvis | Airy Shaw | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.