Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holographis parayana | Miranda | 31 | documented |
| Holographis anisophylla | T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis argyrea | (Leonard) T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis caput-medusae | T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis ehrenbergiana | Nees | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis haenkeana | (Nees) T.F.Daniel, McDade & Kiel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis hintonii | (Leonard) T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis ilicifolia | Brandegee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis leticiana | T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis lizethiae | Cruz Durán & J.Jiménez Ram. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis pallida | Leonard & Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis peloria | (Leonard) T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis pueblensis | T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis tamaulipica | T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis tolantongensis | T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis velutifolia | (House) T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis virgata | (Harv. ex Benth. & Hook.f.) T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Holographis websteri | T.F.Daniel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.