Hieronyma

Accepted species 23 Documented here 3 Family Phyllanthaceae

Accepted species 23 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Hieronyma rufa P.Franco 18 documented
Hieronyma alchorneoides Allemão 3 documented
Hieronyma asperifolia Pax & K.Hoffm. 3 documented
Hieronyma fendleri Briq. 2 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma antioquensis Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma boliviana Pax 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma clusioides (Tul.) Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma crassistipula Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma cubana Müll.Arg. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma domingensis Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma duquei Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma havanensis Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma huilensis Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma jamaicensis Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma macrocarpa Müll.Arg. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma montana Alain 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma nipensis Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma oblonga (Tul.) Müll.Arg. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma ovata Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma paucinervis Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma reticulata Britton ex Rothdauscher 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma scabra Müll.Arg. 0 below the evidence gate
Hieronyma scabrida (Tul.) Müll.Arg. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.