Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heteropsis boliviana | Rusby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis croatii | M.L.Soares | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis duckeana | M.L.Soares | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis ecuadorensis | Sodiro | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis flexuosa | (Kunth) G.S.Bunting | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis linearis | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis longispathacea | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis macrophylla | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis melinonii | (Engl.) A.M.E.Jonker & Jonker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis oblongifolia | Kunth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis peruviana | K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis reticulata | Croat & M.L.Soares | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis rigidifolia | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis robusta | (G.S.Bunting) M.L.Soares | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis salicifolia | Kunth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis spruceana | Schott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis steyermarkii | G.S.Bunting | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis tenuispadix | G.S.Bunting | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heteropsis vasquezii | Croat & M.L.Soares | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.