Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Herrania purpurea | (Pittier) R.E.Schult. | 8 | documented |
| Herrania mariae | (Mart.) Goudot | 6 | documented |
| Herrania albiflora | Goudot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania amazonica | Huber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania balaensis | P.Preuss | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania breviligulata | R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania camargoana | R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania cuatrecasasiana | García-Barr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania dugandii | García-Barr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania kanukuensis | R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania kofanorum | R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania laciniifolia | Goudot ex Triana & Planch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania lemniscata | (M.R.Schomb.) R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania nitida | (Poepp.) R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania nycterodendron | R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania pulcherrima | Goudot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania tomentella | R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Herrania umbratica | R.E.Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.