Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heliamphora nutans | Benth. | 3 | documented |
| Heliamphora arenicola | Wistuba, A.Fleischm., Nerz & S.McPherson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora ceracea | Nerz, Wistuba, Grantsau, Rivadavia, A.Fleischm. & S.McPherso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora chimantensis | Wistuba, Carow & Harbarth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora collina | Wistuba, Nerz, S.McPherson & A.Fleischm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora elongata | Nerz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora exappendiculata | (Maguire & Steyerm.) Nerz & Wistuba | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora folliculata | Wistuba, Harbarth & Carow | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora glabra | (Maguire) Nerz, Wistuba & Hoogenstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora heterodoxa | Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora hispida | Wistuba & Nerz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora ionasi | Maguire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora minor | Gleason | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora parva | (Maguire) S.McPherson, A.Fleischm., Wistuba & Nerz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora pulchella | Wistuba, Carow, Harbarth & Nerz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora purpurascens | Wistuba, A.Fleischm., Nerz & S.McPherson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora sarracenioides | Carow, Wistuba & Harbarth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Heliamphora tatei | Gleason | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.