Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hedera helix | L. | 7,882 | documented |
| Hedera canariensis | Willd. | 293 | documented |
| Hedera colchica | (K.Koch) K.Koch | 84 | documented |
| Hedera rhombea | (Miq.) Paul | 70 | documented |
| Hedera hibernica | Poit. | 57 | documented |
| Hedera maderensis | K.Koch ex A.Rutherf. | 47 | documented |
| Hedera algeriensis | Rantonnet ex C.Morren | 28 | documented |
| Hedera azorica | Carrière | 13 | documented |
| Hedera nepalensis | K.Koch | 4 | documented |
| Hedera maroccana | McAll. | 3 | documented |
| Hedera pastuchovii | Woronow | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera × sepulcralis | R.H.Marshall & McAll. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera × soroksarensis | M.Bényei-Himmer & M.Höhn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera caucasigena | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera crebrescens | M.Bényei-Himmer & M.Höhn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera cypria | McAll. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera iberica | (McAll.) Ackerf. & J.Wen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera maynensis | Spruce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera rhizomatifera | (McAll.) Jury | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera sinensis | (Tobler) Hand.-Mazz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera siyuanwukouensis | S.S.Ying | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera taurica | (Hibberd) Carrière | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hedera unifolia | Vell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.