Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hebenstretia integrifolia | L. | 111 | documented |
| Hebenstretia cordata | L. | 73 | documented |
| Hebenstretia repens | Jaroscz | 49 | documented |
| Hebenstretia comosa | Hochst. | 33 | documented |
| Hebenstretia lanceolata | (E.Mey.) Rolfe | 28 | documented |
| Hebenstretia dura | Choisy | 26 | documented |
| Hebenstretia dentata | L. | 18 | documented |
| Hebenstretia parviflora | E.Mey. | 14 | documented |
| Hebenstretia robusta | E.Mey. | 13 | documented |
| Hebenstretia angolensis | Rolfe | 10 | documented |
| Hebenstretia oatesii | Rolfe | 9 | documented |
| Hebenstretia paarlensis | Roessler | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia anomala | Roessler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia dregei | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia fastigiosa | Jaroscz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia glaucescens | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia hamulosa | E.Mey. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia holubii | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia kamiesbergensis | Roessler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia minutiflora | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia namaquensis | Roessler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia neglecta | Roessler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia ramosissima | Jaroscz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia rehmannii | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hebenstretia sarcocarpa | Bolus ex Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.