Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haplocladium microphyllum | (Sw. ex Hedw.) Müll.Hal. | 21 | documented |
| Haplocladium angustifolium | (Hampe & Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium discolor | (Paris & Broth.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium dispersum | (Müll.Hal. ex Broth.) Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium filirameum | (Broth. & Paris) M.Fleisch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium gracilisetum | Thér. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium jacquemontii | (Bruch & Schimp. ex Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium kiusiuense | Broth. ex Ihsiba | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium larminatii | (Broth. & Paris) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium parvulum | R.Watan. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium perparaphyllum | R.Watan. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium persistens | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium plumulosum | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium porphyreopelma | Müll.Hal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium schimperi | Thér. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium stratosum | (Mitt.) Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium strictulum | (Cardot) Reimers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium vestitum | Dixon & P.de la Varde | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Haplocladium virginianum | (Brid.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.