Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hampea appendiculata | (Donn.Sm.) Standl. | 22 | documented |
| Hampea mexicana | Fryxell | 12 | documented |
| Hampea trilobata | Standl. | 6 | documented |
| Hampea longipes | Miranda | 3 | documented |
| Hampea nutricia | Fryxell | 3 | documented |
| Hampea montebellensis | Fryxell | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea albipetala | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea bracteolata | Lundell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea breedlovei | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea integerrima | Schltdl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea lanceolata | F.Areces | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea micrantha | A.Robyns | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea ovatifolia | Lundell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea platanifolia | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea punctulata | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea reynae | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea rovirosae | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea sphaerocarpa | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea stipitata | S.Watson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea thespesioides | Triana & Planch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Hampea tomentosa | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.