Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gymnostomum aeruginosum | Sm. | 6 | documented |
| Gymnostomum viridulum | Brid. | 3 | documented |
| Gymnostomum bahiense | Salzm. ex Duby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum bescherellei | Broth. & Geh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum bewsii | Sim ex Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum calcareum | Nees & Hornsch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum carthusianum | (Vill. ex Brid.) P.Beauv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum chenii | K.Saito | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum foliosum | Röhl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum hymenostylioides | (Broth. & Dixon) R.H.Zander | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum laxirete | (Broth.) P.C.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum lessonii | Besch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum lingulatum | Rehmann ex Sim | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum ludovicae | Broth. & Paris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum madagascariense | O'Shea | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum mosis | (Lorentz) Jur. & Milde | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum simplicissimum | (Lour. ex P.Beauv.) Brid. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum splachnobryoides | Bizot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gymnostomum unguiculatum | H.Philib. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.