Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guilandina bonduc | L. | 455 | documented |
| Guilandina minax | (Hance) G.P.Lewis | 13 | documented |
| Guilandina barkeriana | (Urb. & Ekman) Britton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina caymanensis | (Millsp.) Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina ciliata | Bergius ex Wikstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina culebrae | Britton & P.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina delphinensis | (Du Puy & R.Rabev.) G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina glaucophylla | (Urb.) Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina intermedia | (Urb.) Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina major | (Medik.) Small | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina murifructa | (Gillis & Proctor) G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina portoricensis | Britton & P.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina robusta | (C.T.White) G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina solomonensis | (Hattink) G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina sphaerosperma | (Urb. & Ekman) Britton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina urophylla | (Donn.Sm.) Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina volkensii | (Harms) G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Guilandina wrightiana | (Urb.) Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.