Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Griffinia alba | K.D.Preuss & Meerow | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia angustifolia | Campos-Rocha, Dutilh & Semir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia aracensis | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia arifolia | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia capixabae | Campos-Rocha & Dutilh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia colatinensis | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia concinna | (Mart.) Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia espiritensis | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia gardneriana | (Herb.) Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia hyacinthina | (Ker Gawl.) Ker Gawl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia ilheusiana | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia intermedia | Lindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia itambensis | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia liboniana | C.Morren | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia meerowiana | Campos-Rocha & M.Peixoto | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia mucurina | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia nocturna | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia ornata | T.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia parviflora | [Ker-Gawl.] | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia paubrasilica | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia rochae | G.M.Morel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Griffinia rostrata | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.