Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gongylolepis benthamiana | Schomb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis bracteata | Maguire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis colombiana | (Cuatrec.) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis cortesii | (S.Díaz) Pruski & S.Díaz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis erioclada | S.F.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis fruticosa | Maguire, Steyerm. & Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis glaberrima | S.F.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis huachamacari | Maguire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis jauaensis | (Aristeg., Maguire & Steyerm.) V.M.Badillo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis martiana | (Baker) Steyerm. & Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis oblanceolata | Pruski | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis paniculata | Maguire & K.D.Phelps | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis paruana | Maguire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis pedunculata | Maguire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gongylolepis yapacana | Maguire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.