Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gollania adunca | S.He | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania arisanensis | Sakurai | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania benguetensis | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania clarescens | (Mitt.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania cylindricarpa | (Mitt.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania elbertii | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania flagellata | Higuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania homalothecioides | Higuchi & P.C.Wu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania japonica | (Cardot) Ando & Higuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania longii | Higuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania neckerella | (Müll.Hal.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania parva | Higuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania pengchengii | Higuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania revoluta | Higuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania robusta | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania ruginosa | (Mitt.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania schensiana | Higuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania setschwanica | (Broth.) Higuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania sinensis | Broth. & Paris ex P.de la Varde | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania tereticaulis | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania turgens | (Müll.Hal.) Ando | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gollania varians | (Mitt.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.