Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glossostelma angolense | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma brevilobum | Goyder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma cabrae | (De Wild.) Goyder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma carsonii | (N.E.Br.) Bullock | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma ceciliae | (N.E.Br.) Goyder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma erectum | (De Wild.) Goyder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma lisianthoides | (Decne.) Bullock | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma mbisiense | Goyder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma nyikense | Goyder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma rusapense | Goyder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma spathulatum | (K.Schum.) Bullock | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossostelma xysmalobioides | (S.Moore) Bullock | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.