Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glossadelphus acutifolius | E.B.Bartram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus amboinensis | M.Fleisch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus anisopterus | (Cardot & P.de la Varde) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus dimorphus | Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus guineensis | (Broth. & Paris) Crosby, B.H.Allen & Magill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus hermaphroditus | M.Fleisch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus ivoreanus | (Mitt.) M.Fleisch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus julaceus | Tixier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus limnobioides | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus mauiensis | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus rivicola | Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus semiscabrus | (Renauld & Cardot) Crosby, B.H.Allen & Magill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus singalangensis | Baumgartner & J.Froehl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus strictifolius | (Broth.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus tahitensis | E.B.Bartram | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glossadelphus viridis | (Renauld & Cardot) Crosby, B.H.Allen & Magill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.