Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glaucium flavum | Crantz | 946 | documented |
| Glaucium corniculatum | (L.) Curtis | 125 | documented |
| Glaucium elegans | Fisch. & C.A.Mey. | 9 | documented |
| Glaucium leiocarpum | Boiss. | 8 | documented |
| Glaucium fimbrilligerum | Boiss. | 4 | documented |
| Glaucium grandiflorum | Boiss. & A.Huet | 3 | documented |
| Glaucium calycinum | Boiss. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium arabicum | Fresen. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium acutidentatum | Hausskn. & Bornm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium afghanicum | Kitam. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium alakirensis | Aykurt, K.Yildiz & Özçandir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium aleppicum | Boiss. & Hausskn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium cappadocicum | Boiss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium contortuplicatum | Boiss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium cuneatum | Cullen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium elbursium | Mory | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium insigne | Popov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium mathiolifolium | Mobayen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium oxylobum | Boiss. & Buhse | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium quadratifolium | Fedde | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium refractocarpum | Gilli | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium secmenii | Yild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium squamigerum | Kar. & Kir. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Glaucium vitellinum | Boiss. & Buhse | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.