Geum

Accepted species 69 Documented here 26 Family Rosaceae

Accepted species 69 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Geum urbanum L. 4,230 documented
Geum canadense Jacq. 2,823 documented
Geum rivale L. 2,037 documented
Geum macrophyllum Willd. 1,305 documented
Geum aleppicum Jacq. 1,122 documented
Geum triflorum Pursh 1,076 documented
Geum rossii (R.Br.) Ser. 272 documented
Geum vernum (Raf.) Torr. & A.Gray 255 documented
Geum montanum L. 224 documented
Geum laciniatum Murray 125 documented
Geum cockaynei (F.Bolle) Molloy & C.J.Webb 77 documented
Geum reptans L. 61 documented
Geum peckii Pursh 58 documented
Geum sylvaticum Pourr. 52 documented
Geum uniflorum Buchanan 31 documented
Geum calthifolium Menzies ex Sm. 27 documented
Geum radiatum Michx. 26 documented
Geum virginianum L. 22 documented
Geum capense Thunb. 19 documented
Geum glaciale Adams ex Fisch. 14 documented
Geum quellyon Sweet 14 documented
Geum magellanicum Comm. ex Pers. 13 documented
Geum coccineum Sm. 12 documented
Geum geniculatum Michx. 12 documented
Geum japonicum Thunb. 9 documented
Geum leiospermum Petrie 5 documented
Geum elatum Wall. ex G.Don 2 below the evidence gate
Geum pyrenaicum Mill. 2 below the evidence gate
Geum × aurantiacum Fr. ex Scheutz 0 below the evidence gate
Geum × catlingii J.-P.Bernard & R.Gauthier 0 below the evidence gate
Geum × intermedium Ehrh. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum × macneillii J.-P.Bernard & R.Gauthier 0 below the evidence gate
Geum × macranthum (Kearney ex Rydb.) B.Boivin 0 below the evidence gate
Geum × pulchrum Fernald 0 below the evidence gate
Geum aequilobatum K.M.Purohit & Panigrahi 0 below the evidence gate
Geum albiflorum (Hook.f.) Scheutz 0 below the evidence gate
Geum andicola (Phil.) Reiche 0 below the evidence gate
Geum boliviense Focke 0 below the evidence gate
Geum brevicarpellatum F.Bolle 0 below the evidence gate
Geum bulgaricum Pančić 0 below the evidence gate
Geum convallis M.P.Wilcox 0 below the evidence gate
Geum cortlandicum M.Hough 0 below the evidence gate
Geum divergens Cheeseman 0 below the evidence gate
Geum gonzaloi J.L.Lozano & Serra 0 below the evidence gate
Geum hainesianum M.Hough, A.V.Gilman & Chapm.-Lam 0 below the evidence gate
Geum heterocarpum Boiss. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum hispidum Fr. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum involucratum Juss. ex Pers. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum kokanicum Regel & Schmalh. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum latilobum Sommier & Levier 0 below the evidence gate
Geum lechlerianum Schltdl. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum macrosepalum Ludlow 0 below the evidence gate
Geum meinshausenii Gams 0 below the evidence gate
Geum mexicanum Rydb. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum molle Vis. & Pančić 0 below the evidence gate
Geum peruvianum Focke 0 below the evidence gate
Geum pusillum Petrie 0 below the evidence gate
Geum rhodopeum Stoj. & Stef. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum riojense F.Bolle 0 below the evidence gate
Geum roylei Wall. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum rubrum (Ludlow) Khuroo, K.Hussain & Gulzar 0 below the evidence gate
Geum rupestre (T.T.Yu & C.L.Li) Smedmark 0 below the evidence gate
Geum schofieldii Calder & Roy L.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Geum sikkimense Prain 0 below the evidence gate
Geum speciosum (Albov) Albov 0 below the evidence gate
Geum spurium C.A.Mey. 0 below the evidence gate
Geum sudeticum Tausch 0 below the evidence gate
Geum sunhangii D.G.Zhang, T.Deng, Z.Y.Lv & Z.M.Li 0 below the evidence gate
Geum talbotianum W.M.Curtis 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.