Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geissois magnifica | Baker f. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois balansae | Brongn. & Gris ex Guillaumin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois belema | Pillon & H.C.Hopkins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois bradfordii | H.C.Hopkins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois denhamii | Seem. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois hippocastanifolia | Guillaumin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois hirsuta | Brongn. & Gris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois imthurnii | Turrill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois lanceolata | (Guillaumin) H.C.Hopkins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois montana | Vieill. ex Brongn. & Gris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois pentaphylla | C.T.White | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois polyphylla | Lecard ex Guillaumin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois pruinosa | Brongn. & Gris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois racemosa | Labill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois stipularis | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois superba | Gillespie | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois ternata | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois trifoliolata | Guillaumin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Geissois velutina | Guillaumin ex H.C.Hopkins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.