Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garovaglia elegans | (Dozy & Molk.) Hampe ex Bosch & Sande Lac. | 5 | documented |
| Garovaglia angustifolia | Mitt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia aristata | Bosch & Sande Lac. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia baeuerlenii | (Geh.) Paris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia binsteadii | (Broth.) During | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia brassii | (E.B.Bartram) During | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia compressa | Mitt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia crispa | (Broth. & Geh.) Broth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia crispata | Tixier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia eberhardtii | (Broth. & Paris) During | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia luzonensis | R.S.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia mujuensis | Zanten | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia plicata | (Brid.) Bosch & Sande Lac. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia plumosa | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia powellii | Mitt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia robbinsii | (E.B.Bartram) During | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia setigera | (Sull.) Mitt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia subelegans | Broth. & Geh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia tortifolia | Mitt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Garovaglia zantenii | During | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.