Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaillardia pulchella | Foug. | 2,522 | documented |
| Gaillardia aristata | Pursh | 581 | documented |
| Gaillardia aestivalis | (Walter) H.Rock | 289 | documented |
| Gaillardia pinnatifida | Torr. | 208 | documented |
| Gaillardia suavis | (A.Gray & Engelm.) Britton & Rusby | 154 | documented |
| Gaillardia megapotamica | Baker | 20 | documented |
| Gaillardia comosa | A.Gray | 17 | documented |
| Gaillardia multiceps | Greene | 14 | documented |
| Gaillardia mexicana | A.Gray | 10 | documented |
| Gaillardia coahuilensis | B.L.Turner | 6 | documented |
| Gaillardia cabrerae | Covas | 5 | documented |
| Gaillardia gypsophila | B.L.Turner | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia arizonica | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia doniana | (Hook. & Arn.) Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia grandiflora | Hort. ex Van Houtte | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia grandiflora | Pursh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia henricksonii | B.L.Turner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia parryi | Greene | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia picta | Sweet | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia powellii | B.L.Turner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia scabiosoides | (Arn. ex DC.) Benth. & Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia tontalensis | Hieron. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaillardia turneri | Averett & A.M.Powell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.