Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaga kaulfussii | (Kunze) Fay W.Li & Windham | 32 | documented |
| Gaga marginata | (Kunth) Fay W.Li & Windham | 5 | documented |
| Gaga hintoniorum | (Mendenh. & G.L.Nesom) Fay W.Li & Windham | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga angustifolia | (Kunth) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga apiacea | (Mickel) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga arizonica | (Maxon) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga chaerophylla | (M.Martens & Galeotti) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga complanata | (A.R.Sm.) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga cuneata | (Link) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga decomposita | (M.Martens & Galeotti) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga decurrens | (Mickel) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga germanotta | Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga harrisii | (Maxon) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga hirsuta | (Link) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga lerstenii | (Mickel & Beitel) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga membranacea | (Davenp.) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga monstraparva | Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga pellaeopsis | (Mickel) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Gaga purpusii | (T.Reeves) Fay W.Li & Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.