Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Furcraea foetida | (L.) Haw. | 174 | documented |
| Furcraea guatemalensis | Trel. | 33 | documented |
| Furcraea cabuya | Trel. | 29 | documented |
| Furcraea andina | Trel. | 6 | documented |
| Furcraea hexapetala | (Jacq.) Urb. | 6 | documented |
| Furcraea guerrerensis | Matuda | 5 | documented |
| Furcraea tuberosa | (Mill.) W.T.Aiton | 4 | documented |
| Furcraea longaeva | Karw. & Zucc. | 3 | documented |
| Furcraea parmentieri | (Roezl) García-Mend. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea quicheensis | Trel. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea acaulis | (Kunth) B.Ullrich | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea antillana | A.Álvarez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea boliviensis | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea depauperata | Jacobi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea flavoviridis | Hook. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea macdougalii | Matuda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea martinezii | García-Mend. & L.de la Rosa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea niquivilensis | Matuda ex García-Mend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea occidentalis | Trel. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea pubescens | Tod. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea samalana | Trel. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea selloa | K.Koch | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea stratiotes | Petersen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea stricta | Jacobi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Furcraea undulata | Jacobi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.