Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuertesimalva limensis | (L.) Fryxell | 36 | documented |
| Fuertesimalva peruviana | (L.) Fryxell | 10 | documented |
| Fuertesimalva chilensis | (A.Braun & C.D.Bouché) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva corniculata | (Krapov.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva echinata | (C.Presl) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva insularis | (Kearney) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva jacens | (S.Watson) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva killipii | (Krapov.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva leptocalyx | (Krapov.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva macrocarpa | (Krapov.) Krapov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva multilobata | Krapov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva pennellii | (Ulbr.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva pentacocca | (Krapov.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva pentandra | (K.Schum.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva sanambrosiana | (D.M.Bates) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fuertesimalva stipulata | (Fryxell) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.