Forsstroemia

Accepted species 20 Documented here 1 Family Neckeraceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Forsstroemia trichomitria (Hedw.) Lindb. 50 documented
Forsstroemia coronata (Mont.) Paris 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia cryphaeoides Cardot 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia denigricans (Enroth) Enroth 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia fauriei (Cardot) Enroth 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia flexiramea (Cardot) Enroth 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia goughiana (Mitt.) S.Olsson, Enroth & D.Quandt 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia humilis (Mitt.) Enroth 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia indica (Mont.) Paris 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia inopinata (Enroth & M.C.Ji) Enroth 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia japonica (Besch.) Paris 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia konoi (Broth. ex Cardot) Enroth, Fedosov & Ignatov 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia lasioides (Müll.Hal.) Nog. 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia neckeroides Broth. 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia noguchii L.R.Stark 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia producta (Hornsch.) Paris 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia pusilla (Mitt.) Enroth 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia setschwanica (Broth.) Enroth 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia thomsonii (Mitt.) W.R.Buck 0 below the evidence gate
Forsstroemia yezoana (Besch.) S.Olsson, Enroth & D.Quandt 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.