Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forestiera pubescens | Nutt. | 930 | documented |
| Forestiera reticulata | Torr. | 359 | documented |
| Forestiera segregata | (Jacq.) Krug & Urb. | 149 | documented |
| Forestiera angustifolia | Torr. | 129 | documented |
| Forestiera acuminata | (Michx.) Poir. | 59 | documented |
| Forestiera phillyreoides | (Benth.) Torr. | 40 | documented |
| Forestiera ligustrina | (Michx.) Poir. | 34 | documented |
| Forestiera rhamnifolia | Griseb. | 16 | documented |
| Forestiera rotundifolia | (Brandegee) Standl. | 5 | documented |
| Forestiera durangensis | Standl. | 3 | documented |
| Forestiera macrocarpa | Brandegee | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera cartaginensis | Donn.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera corollata | Cornejo & Wallander | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera ecuadorensis | Cornejo & Bonifaz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera eggersiana | Krug | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera godfreyi | L.C.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera isabelae | Hammel & Cornejo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera racemosa | S.Watson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera rericulata | Torr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera selleana | Urb. & Ekman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera shrevei | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera tomentosa | S.Watson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Forestiera veracruzana | Cast.-Campos & Pal.-Wass. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.