Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fordiophyton brevicaule | C.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton breviscapum | (C.Chen) Y.F.Deng & T.L.Wu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton chenii | S.Jin Zeng & X.Y.Zhuang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton cordifolium | C.Y.Wu ex C.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton damingshanense | S.Y.Liu & X.Q.Ning | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton degeneratum | (C.Chen) Y.F.Deng & T.L.Wu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton elatum | Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton faberi | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton huizhouense | S.Jin Zeng & X.Y.Zhuang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton integrifolium | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton jinpingense | J.H.Dai & Z.Y.Yu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton longipes | Y.C.Huang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton peperomiifolium | (Oliv.) C.Hansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton phamhoangii | (V.T.Pham, V.T.Chinh & Ranil) T.V.Do & Ying Liu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton repens | Y.C.Huang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton strictum | Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton tereticaule | S.Jin Zeng & N.H.Xia | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Fordiophyton zhuangiae | S.Jin Zeng & G.D.Tang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.