Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floscopa scandens | Lour. | 58 | documented |
| Floscopa glomerata | (Willd. ex Schult. & Schult.f.) Hassk. | 7 | documented |
| Floscopa peruviana | Hassk. ex C.B.Clarke | 6 | documented |
| Floscopa robusta | (Seub.) C.B.Clarke | 6 | documented |
| Floscopa africana | (P.Beauv.) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa aquatica | Hua | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa axillaris | (Poir.) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa confusa | Brenan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa elegans | Huber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa flavida | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa glabrata | (Kunth) Hassk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa gossweileri | Cavaco | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa leiothyrsa | Brenan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa mannii | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa perforans | Rusby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa polypleura | Brenan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa rivularioides | T.Fries | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa schweinfurthii | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa tanneri | Brenan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa tuberculata | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Floscopa yunnanensis | D.Y.Hong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.