Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flacourtia indica | (Burm.f.) Merr. | 107 | documented |
| Flacourtia montana | J.Graham | 39 | documented |
| Flacourtia rukam | Zoll. & Moritzi | 23 | documented |
| Flacourtia inermis | Roxb. | 6 | documented |
| Flacourtia jangomas | (Lour.) Raeusch. | 3 | documented |
| Flacourtia amalotricha | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia cavaleriei | H.Lév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia degeneri | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia flavescens | Willd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia helferi | Gamble ex Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia kinabaluensis | Sleumer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia latifolia | (Hook.f. & Thomson) T.Cooke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia mollipila | Sleumer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia mollis | Hook.f. & Thomson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia occidentalis | Blatt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia oppositifolia | Gagnep. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia subintegra | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia territorialis | Airy Shaw | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia tomentella | Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia vitiensis | (Seem.) A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia vogelii | Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flacourtia zippelii | Slooten | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.