Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exallage chrysotricha | (Palib.) Neupane & N.Wikstr. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage angustifolia | (DC.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage auricularia | (L.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage barbata | (Korth.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage buruensis | (Miq.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage ciliicaulis | (Miq.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage cristata | (Willd.) Nandikar & K.C.Kishor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage insularis | (Spreng.) Neupane & N.Wikstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage lapeyrousei | (DC.) Neupane & N.Wikstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage macrophylla | (Zoll. & Moritzi) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage microcephala | (Pierre ex Pit.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage pachycarpa | (Ridl.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage paradoxa | (Kurz) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage parietarioides | (Miq.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage perhispida | (Elmer) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage pressa | (Pit.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage radicans | (Bartl. ex DC.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Exallage ulmifolia | (Wall.) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.