Euplassa

Accepted species 20 Documented here 0 Family Proteaceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Euplassa bahiensis (Meisn.) I.M.Johnst. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa cantareirae Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa chimantensis Steyerm. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa duquei Killip & Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa glaziovii (Mez) Steyerm. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa hoehnei Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa inaequalis (Pohl) Engl. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa incana (Klotzsch) I.M.Johnst. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa isernii Cuatrec. ex J.F.Macbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa itatiaiae Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa legalis (Vell.) I.M.Johnst. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa madeirae Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa nebularis Rambo & Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa occidentalis I.M.Johnst. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa organensis (Gardner) I.M.Johnst. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa pinnata (Lam.) I.M.Johnst. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa rufa (Loes.) Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa saxicola (R.E.Schult.) Steyerm. 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa semicostata Plana 0 below the evidence gate
Euplassa taubertiana K.Schum. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.