Erythrospermum

Accepted species 24 Documented here 0 Family Achariaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Erythrospermum acuminatissimum (A.Gray) A.C.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum ampullaceum Baker 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum boivinianum Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum candidum (Becc.) Becc. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum capitatum Baker 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum cavaleriei H.Lév. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum coffeaefolium Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum coffeifolium Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum corymbosum Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum crassipes Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum elegans Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum fischeri Engl. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum laurei Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum monticola Thouars 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum monticola Thouars 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum nossibeense Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum novogranatense Hieron. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum pervillei Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum recurvifolium Baker 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum richardianum Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum rignyanum Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum sifarii Hul, Labat & O.Pascal 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum sparsiflorum Baker 0 below the evidence gate
Erythrospermum zeylanicum (Gaertn.) Alston 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.