Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erisma arietinum | M.L.Kawas. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma bicolor | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma blancoa | Marc.-Berti | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma bracteosum | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma calcaratum | (Link) Warm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma costatum | Stafleu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma djalma-batistae | Paula | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma floribundum | Rudge | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma fuscum | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma gracile | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma japura | Spruce ex Warm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma lanceolatum | Stafleu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma laurifolium | Warm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma maliforme | Link | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma megalophyllum | Stafleu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma micranthum | Spruce ex Warm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma nitidum | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma niveum | Link | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma panamense | M.L.Kawas., S.Castillo & McPherson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma silvae | Marc.-Berti | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma splendens | Stafleu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma tessmannii | Pilg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erisma uncinatum | Warm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.