Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erianthemum dregei | (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Tiegh. | 80 | documented |
| Erianthemum ngamicum | (Sprague) Danser | 11 | documented |
| Erianthemum virescens | (N.E.Br.) Wiens & Polhill | 5 | documented |
| Erianthemum aethiopicum | Balle ex Wiens & Polhill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum alveatum | (Sprague) Danser | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum commiphorae | (Engl.) Danser | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum lanatum | Wiens & Polhill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum lindense | (Sprague) Danser | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum melanocarpum | (Balle) Wiens & Polhill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum nyikense | (Sprague) Danser | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum occultum | (Sprague) Danser | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum rotundifolium | Wiens & Polhill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum schelei | Tiegh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum schmitzii | Balle ex Wiens & Polhill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum taborense | (Engl.) Tiegh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum taborensis | (Engl.) Tiegh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erianthemum viticola | Balle ex Wiens & Polhill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.