Eremitis

Accepted species 16 Documented here 0 Family Poaceae

Accepted species 16 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Eremitis aemula F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis afimbriata F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis berbertii F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis clarkiae F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis fluminensis F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis grandiflora F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis limae F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis linearifolia Hollowell, F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis magnifica F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis multiflora (R.P.Oliveira, Longhi-Wagner & Hollowell) F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis parviflora (Trin.) C.E.Calderón ex Soderstr. 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis paucifolia F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis riodocensis F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis robusta Hollowell, F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis victoriae F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate
Eremitis vinacea F.M.Ferreira & R.P.Oliveira 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.