Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erechtites hieraciifolius | (L.) Raf. ex DC. | 2,391 | documented |
| Erechtites minimus | (Poir.) DC. | 967 | documented |
| Erechtites valerianifolius | (Wolf) DC. | 214 | documented |
| Erechtites albiflorus | (Sch.Bip.) Hassemer & Funez | 4 | documented |
| Erechtites leptanthus | (Phil.) Cabrera | 3 | documented |
| Erechtites bathurstiana | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites bukaensis | Rechinger & Muschl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites glossantha | Sond. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites goyazensis | (Gardner) Cabrera | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites hieracifolia | (L.) Raf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites hieraciifolia | (L.) Raf. ex DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites hispidulus | (A.Rich.) DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites ignobilis | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites lacerata | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites minimus | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites missionis | Malme | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites missionum | Malme | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites prenanthoides | (A.Rich.) DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites runcinata | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites valerianae | (Wolf) DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Erechtites valerianifolia | (Link ex Spreng.) DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.