Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eranthemum roseum | (Vahl) R.Br. ex Roem. & Schult. | 52 | documented |
| Eranthemum pulchellum | Andrews | 35 | documented |
| Eranthemum capense | L. | 11 | documented |
| Eranthemum austrosinense | H.S.Lo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum burmanicum | N.P.Balakr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum ciliatum | (Craib) Benoist | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum decumbens | Kladwong & Chantar. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum erythrochilum | J.R.I.Wood | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum griffithii | (T.Anderson) Bremek. & Nann.-Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum macrophyllum | Wall. ex Nees | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum macrostachys | (T.Anderson) N.P.Balakr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum macrostachyum | (T.Anderson) N.P.Balakr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum obovatum | Imlay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum pubescens | Roth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum purpurascens | Wight ex Nees | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum splendens | (T.Anderson) Bremek. & Nann.-Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum strictum | Colebr. ex Roxb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum suffruticosum | Roxb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum sumatranum | Bremek. & Nann.-Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum tetragonum | Wall. ex Nees | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum tubiflorum | (T.Anderson) Radlk. ex Lindau | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum viscidum | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum wardii | (W.W.Sm.) N.P.Balakr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Eranthemum wattii | (Bedd.) Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.