Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epithema ceylanicum | Gardner | 7 | documented |
| Epithema carnosum | Benth. | 6 | documented |
| Epithema sarawakense | Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema benthamii | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema dolichopodum | Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema horsfieldii | (R.Br.) A.DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema involucratum | (Roxb.) B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema longipetiolatum | (Merr.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema longitubum | Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema madulidii | Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema membranaceum | (King) Kiew | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema parvibracteatum | Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema philippinum | (Hilliard & B.L.Burtt) Bransgr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema pusillum | (C.B.Clarke) Bransgr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema rennellense | Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema saxatile | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema steenisii | Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema strigosum | (C.B.Clarke) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema tenerum | (C.B.Clarke) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Epithema tenue | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.