Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteropogon macrostachyus | (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Munro ex Benth. | 9 | documented |
| Enteropogon acicularis | (Lindl.) Lazarides | 6 | documented |
| Enteropogon dolichostachyus | (Lag.) Keng | 5 | documented |
| Enteropogon prieurii | (Kunth) Clayton | 3 | documented |
| Enteropogon barbatus | C.E.Hubb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon coimbatorensis | K.K.N.Nair, S.K.Jain & M.P.Nayar | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon longiaristatus | (Napper) Clayton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon minutus | Lazarides | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon monostachyos | (Vahl) K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon monostachyus | Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon paucispiceus | (Lazarides) B.K.Simon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon ramosus | B.K.Simon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon rupestris | (J.A.Schmidt) A.Chev. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon sechellensis | (Baker) T.Durand & Schinz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enteropogon unispiceus | (F.Muell.) Clayton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.