Eliokarmos

Accepted species 34 Documented here 6 Family Asparagaceae

Accepted species 34 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Eliokarmos dubius (Houtt.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 350 documented
Eliokarmos thyrsoides (Jacq.) Raf. 300 documented
Eliokarmos thunbergianus (Baker) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo, M.Pinter & Wetschnig 124 documented
Eliokarmos rupestris (L.f.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 32 documented
Eliokarmos pruinosus (F.M.Leight.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 25 documented
Eliokarmos conicus (Jacq.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 5 documented
Eliokarmos bicornutus (F.M.Leight.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos ceresianus (F.M.Leight.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos ciliiferus (U.Müll.-Doblies & D.Müll.-Doblies) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos constrictus (F.M.Leight.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos corticatus (Mart.-Azorín) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos craibii Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo, M.Pinter & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos decus-montium (G.Will.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos deltoideus (Baker) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos geniculatus (Oberm.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos gifbergensis (U.Müll.-Doblies & D.Müll.-Doblies) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos hallii (Oberm.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos hispidulus (U.Müll.-Doblies & D.Müll.-Doblies) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos humanii Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo, M.Á.Alonso & M.Pinter 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos inandensis (Baker) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos inclusus (F.M.Leight.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos leeupoortensis (U.Müll.-Doblies & D.Müll.-Doblies) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos multifolius (Baker) Mart.-Azorín, A.P.Dold, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos namaquanulus (U.Müll.-Doblies & D.Müll.-Doblies) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos naviculus (W.F.Barker ex Oberm.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos pendens (van Jaarsv.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo, M.Pinter & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos pilosus (Jacq.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos puberulus (Oberm.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos richtersveldense (van Jaarsv.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo, M.Á.Alonso & M.Pinter 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos rossouwii (U.Müll.-Doblies & D.Müll.-Doblies) Mart.-Azorín, A.P.Dold, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos rubescens (F.M.Leight.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos strictus (L.Bolus) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos synanthifolius (F.M.Leight.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate
Eliokarmos thermophilus (F.M.Leight.) Mart.-Azorín, M.B.Crespo & Juan 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.