Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elattostachys xylocarpa | Radlk. | 87 | documented |
| Elattostachys nervosa | Radlk. | 17 | documented |
| Elattostachys aiyurensis | Adema | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys angulosa | Adema | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys apetala | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys dzumacensis | Adema | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys erythrocarpa | Adema | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys globosa | Adema | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys goropuensis | Adema | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys incisa | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys megalantha | S.T.Reynolds | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys microcarpa | S.T.Reynolds | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys obliquinervis | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys palauensis | Hosok. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys rubrofructus | Adema | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys solomonensis | Adema | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys tetraporandra | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys venosus | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys verrucosa | (Blume) Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Elattostachys zippeliana | (Blume) Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.