Ehrharta

Accepted species 28 Documented here 10 Family Poaceae

Accepted species 28 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Ehrharta erecta Lam. 810 documented
Ehrharta calycina Sm. 398 documented
Ehrharta longiflora Sm. 333 documented
Ehrharta diplax F.Muell. 234 documented
Ehrharta villosa Schult.f. 90 documented
Ehrharta ramosa Thunb. 45 documented
Ehrharta capensis Thunb. 26 documented
Ehrharta thunbergii Gibbs Russ. 17 documented
Ehrharta longifolia Schrad. 5 documented
Ehrharta dura Nees 3 documented
Ehrharta brevifolia Schrad. 2 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta eburnea Gibbs Russ. 2 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta rupestris Nees 2 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta triandra Nees 1 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta barbinodis Nees 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta bulbosa Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta delicatula Stapf 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta digyna Thunb. 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta festucacea Willd. ex Schult. & Schult.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta godefroyi C.Cordem. 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta longigluma C.E.Hubb. 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta melicoides Thunb. 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta microlaena Nees 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta ottonis Kuntze ex Nees 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta penicillata C.Cordem. 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta pusilla Nees 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta rehmannii Stapf 0 below the evidence gate
Ehrharta setacea Nees 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.